The "Too Tight to Review" series covers
the
pairs of underwear I’ve tried on that I couldn’t wear long enough to give a
fair review. If I can’t
keep
a pair on for at least the length of the day, I’ll leave a few brief thoughts
rather than a full review.
Sukrew
is
a company I’ve reviewed once
before,
and I had mostly positive things to say about my experiences. The first pair
of Sukrew
I received was oddly small in the back (an issue that I had never experienced before
that), but had a big, comfortable pouch and solid
construction
quality. That experience made my experience with the Full Trunk surprising.
First of all, the backside on this one is so short that it won’t even fit over
my hips in any normal way. (The material is stretchy, but enough so to
compensate
for
the bizarre dimensions.) As a result, the only way I could put these on was
with the entire garment rotated upwards in the front. This strange fit forced me deep into the bottom of the pouch
(which is slightly smaller than the pouch
on
the Full Brief), and I couldn’t wear these for more than a few hours without pain.
I should also make a not about the durability.
After
washing the Full Brief just once, the seams starting coming loose, spilling a
spider web of threads that tore at my skin the second time I tried wearing
these. Looking at the inside of the waistband, the stitching is uneven and
poorly integrated.
Even
the white Sukrew label on the front was coming undone. This is perhaps the
fastest any pair of underwear I’ve owned has deteriorated, and was surprising, given
the solid quality of the Full Brief.
Showing posts with label too tight to review. Show all posts
Showing posts with label too tight to review. Show all posts
Friday, May 19, 2017
Wednesday, March 15, 2017
Too Tight to Review 8: Jack Adams Relay Brief
The “Too Tight To Review” series covers the pairs of underwear I’ve tried on that I couldn’t wear long enough to give a fair review. If I can’t keep a pair on for at least the length of the day, I’ll leave a few brief thoughts rather than a full review.
Jack Adams is an underwear company that I have heard mentioned a few times in terms of comfortable underwear, so I decided to give them a try. The first thing I noticed is how small the overall garment is; even though I followed the size chart on their website and ordered a size up from what I usually get, it still felt extremely small, the backside was too short (a complaint I rarely have), and what little extra fabric it had where a pouch should have been would be far better as an actual pouch. I had to take it off after a few hours. The Jack Adams Relay Brief is not an outrageously bad item, but I certainly can’t recommend it as a comfortable one.
Friday, February 24, 2017
Too Tight to Review 7: C-IN2 Super Bright Army Trunk
The “Too Tight To Review” series covers the pairs of
underwear I’ve tried on that I couldn’t wear long enough to give a fair review.
If I can’t keep a pair on for at least the length of the day, I’ll leave a few
brief thoughts rather than a full review.
C-IN2 is “an American apparel company first made famous for it's line of stylish men'sunderwear.” They seem to get mentioned frequently when comfortable underwear is
discussed, so I decided to give the “Super Bright Army Trunk” a chance. This
item does have merits: It seems well constructed, it dries fast, and it
breathes well, which makes the fabric appropriate for exercise. The tag is
stitched on in a way that makes it remain legible while not becoming
uncomfortable. It’s just not big enough, though. The amount of space that the
item allots for the genitals is inadequate, and the fabric (96% polyester, 4%
spandex) isn’t stretchy enough to compensate.
Wednesday, November 2, 2016
Too Tight to Review 6: PUMP! Sugar Rush Jogger
The “Too Tight To Review” series covers the pairs of underwear I’ve tried on that I couldn’t wear long enough to give a fair review. If I can’t keep a pair on for at least the length of the day, I’ll leave a few brief thoughts rather than a full review.
Pump Underwear, as I’ve mentioned before, is a Canadian company that produces workout-themed attire, primarily underwear. The Jogger boxers are a series of boxers that each have two mesh pockets. On the Sugar Rush Jogger, two mesh pockets and a mesh pouch are attached to a cotton blend body. Just like the first PUMP! item I’ve reviewed, the construction quality is absolutely top notch, and the item looks great, too. Unfortunately, the pouch isn’t nearly big enough, so this item isn’t usable for me. (I can't even fully pull it up onto my hips.) If PUMP! ever created underwear with large pouches, they’d probably be my favorite underwear company.
Saturday, October 1, 2016
Too Tight to Review 5: Diesel Hero Fresh and Bright Cotton Modal Trunk
The “Too Tight To Review” series covers the pairs of underwear I’ve tried on that I couldn’t wear long enough to give a fair review. If I can’t keep a pair on for at least the length of the day, I’ll leave a few brief thoughts rather than a full review.
Diesel is a company I’ve reviewed here before. Their men’s underwear is varied in terms of fit, and some of the styles are quite comfortable. When I got the Hero Fresh and Bright Cotton Modal Trunk, I was hopeful about the fit. Many of the most comfortable pairs of underwear I’ve purchased are made of modal fabric, which is stretchy and soft, and this item is composed of 57% cotton, 38% modal and 5% elastane (spandex). Unlike the similar fabric blend found in the BOSS HUGO BOSS Cotton Modal Mini Brief, the fabric in this Diesel offering is thicker, tougher, and more rubbery. The item is well made, and fits over the hips and glutes impressively. The problem is that it is not anatomically correct to any significant degree, and the stretchiness of the fabric is not enough to accommodate the genitals comfortably. As soon as I put it on, I felt very uncomfortable, and couldn’t manage to rearrange it in a way that made it wearable. This experience was a disappointment, but not enough for me to discard my generally positive opinion of Diesel.
Thursday, September 8, 2016
Too Tight to Review 4: Emporio Armani Magnum Cotton Stretch Trunk
The “Too
Tight To Review” series covers the pairs of underwear I’ve tried on that I
couldn’t wear long enough to give a fair review. If I can’t keep a pair on for
at least the length of the day, I’ll leave a few brief thoughts rather than a
full review.
Like the Supanova Hip Brief, this
item has something that could be considered a contour pouch, so I decided to
order it to see if it would fit comfortably. The first thing I noticed after
opening the packaging was the long tag in the back, which is never a good
design choice. Putting the trunks up over my hips was strange and uncomfortable
due to a web of stitching across the back that limits the flexibility of the item. The pouch itself wasn’t
flexible, and I felt some pain within seconds of adjusting the trunks into
their resting position. Clearly, this is not a pair for me. However, unlike
some pairs of underwear that don’t allocate enough room in the crotch for my
comfort, I couldn’t imagine this one fitting anyone comfortably. It comes off as merely a poorly-designed cash-grab
from a high-end fashion company. I can’t think of a single good thing to write
about this item. If I gave numeric scores for my “Too Tight To Review” series,
this would get the lowest score possible.
Tuesday, August 30, 2016
Too Tight to Review 3: Supawear Supanova Hip Brief
The "Too Tight to Review" series covers the pairs of underwear I've tried on that I couldn't wear long enough to give a fair review. If I can't keep a pair on for at least the length of the day, I'll leave a few brief thoughts rather than a full review.
Supawear is an Australian company that makes men’s clothing. They have some cool-looking designs, so I decided to order the Supanova Hip Brief to see if it would offer a comfortable fit. They do utilize a proper pouch, separated from the rest of the garment like many of the most comfortable pairs of underwear I’ve tried, so I thought I might have good results. When it arrived, I noticed that the size looked as if it would wear a bit small, but that hasn’t always been an issue. Quality looked decent. Putting it on, I immediately realized that the space allotted for my genitals wouldn’t be nearly enough. The experience I’ve had with constricting pouch underwear is that pouches are only a benefit for comfort if they’re big enough. If they’re not, they merely force the genitals into an insufficient space and become worse than a more generic underwear design. Supawear isn’t an option for me.
Supawear is an Australian company that makes men’s clothing. They have some cool-looking designs, so I decided to order the Supanova Hip Brief to see if it would offer a comfortable fit. They do utilize a proper pouch, separated from the rest of the garment like many of the most comfortable pairs of underwear I’ve tried, so I thought I might have good results. When it arrived, I noticed that the size looked as if it would wear a bit small, but that hasn’t always been an issue. Quality looked decent. Putting it on, I immediately realized that the space allotted for my genitals wouldn’t be nearly enough. The experience I’ve had with constricting pouch underwear is that pouches are only a benefit for comfort if they’re big enough. If they’re not, they merely force the genitals into an insufficient space and become worse than a more generic underwear design. Supawear isn’t an option for me.
Monday, July 4, 2016
Too Tight to Review 2: Lacoste Pique Brief
The “Too Tight To Review” series covers the pairs of
underwear I’ve tried on that I couldn’t wear long enough to give a fair review.
If I can’t keep a pair on for at least the length of the day, I’ll leave a few
brief thoughts rather than a full review.
Lacoste is a French clothing company best known
for their polo shirts. I’ve had good experiences with the Lacoste clothing I’ve
picked up, so I decided to give the Lacoste
Pique Brief a try. The item in question has a pretty basic design, made
with the same material used in their famous polo shirts. The mix of visual
textures and patterns, especially on the waistband’s logo, looks good. The
material has the benefit of good breathability, and doesn’t feel bad on the
skin. On the other hand, the material is not especially stretchy, and it has a
double layer in pouch region, which makes it quite inflexible and uncomfortable.
A fairly large tag sewn into the left side is another questionable design choice
that decreases comfort. I couldn’t wear these for more than an hour before I
started to feel pain in my groin.
Thursday, June 30, 2016
Too Tight to Review 1: Andrew Christian W/ Show-It (2 items)
The “Too
Tight to Review” series covers the pairs of underwear I’ve tried on that I
couldn’t wear long enough to give a fair review. If I can’t keep a pair on for
at least the length of one day, I’ll leave a few brief thoughts rather than a
full review.
“Show-It”
technology is a feature found on many pairs of Andrew Christian underwear. According to their website, its “maximum frontal support adds up to 1.5” (3.8cm) onto
your current frontal measurements." An elastic band supported by
a sheet of fabric is designed to go behind the testicles, raising the entire
package up and forward. I thought the feature might be useful for keeping my package
from falling between my legs while sitting, so I decided to order the CoolFlex Tagless Brief W/ Show-It.
When briefs
arrived, I realized that the pouch is rather small for an Andrew Christian
brief, even without taking the Show-It feature into account. I slipped them on
and immediately realized these were far too tight. They put more uncomfortable
pressure on my testicles than any other pair of underwear I’ve tried, and after
about ten seconds of adjusting in vain, I had to take them off.
Suspecting
that the small overall pouch size on the first pair I tried might have been
responsible for my discomfort, I decided to try out a Show-It item from their
line with the biggest pouches: Trophy
Boy Link Brief W/ Show-It. Trying this on just confirmed that Show-It
pouches were unusable for me.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)